• CACVS
  • CACVS
  • CACVS
  • CACVS
  • CACVS
  • CACVS
  
     

Saturday January 19 (Venous session)
Room B, level 0

   
  08.00     Welcome address, J-L. Gérard
   
Moderators
    SESSION I: POST THROMBOTIC SYNDROME - ATYPICAL VARICOSE VEINS
A. Bisdorff
  08.15     IVUS: should it be used more extensively in deep venous reconstructive surgery? P. Neglen
  08.25     Evolution of the neovalve technique and for which patients? M. Lugli
  08.35     Do perforator veins always need to be treated or should treatment be limited to C5 and C6 venous disease and how? P. Gloviczki
  08.45     Atypical varicose vein from gluteal source
  08.45     Atypical varicose veins from gluteal source: etiopathogeny and how to point them out,
P. Lemasle
  08.55     Endovascular treatment of atypical varicose veins originating from the inferior gluteal vein,
M. Greiner
  09.05     Sclerosing agent: clarification of venous lesion treatment, A. Bisdorff
  09.15     Discussion
         
 

Moderators
    SESSION II: TREATMENT OF THE SMALL SAPHENOUS VEIN.
DEBATE: THE SAFEST OR THE MOST EFFICIENT?

I. Vanhandenhove, M. S. Whiteley, G. Jantet
  09.20     MCQ from clinical cases: what is your opinion at this stage?
  09.30     Is it safe and efficient to treat the small saphenous vein:
        by surgery, D. Creton
        by radiofrequency ablation, J. Lawson
        by sclerotherapy (foam)
        by endovenous laser ablation, J-L. Gérard
  10.00     MCQ and discussion: have you changed your mind after these presentations and debates in terms of your procedures?
         
  10.10     Break in the exhibition hall
         
 

Moderators
    SESSION III: COMPETENCE OR INCOMPETENCE OF THE TERMINAL AND PRE-TERMINAL VALVE: DOES IT CHANGE YOUR MODE OF TREATMENT?
M. Perrin,T. Proebstle
  10.40     MCQ from clinical cases: what is your opinion at this stage?
  10.50     Different patterns of reflux at the saphenous femoral junction. Is it easy to identify them and how? O. Pichot
  11.00     Hemodynamics of the saphenous-femoral junction. Patterns of reflux and their clinical  implications, M. Cappelli
  11.10     If the terminal and/or pre terminal is competent or incompetent, does it change your mode of treatment?
        by foam, C. Hamel Desnos
        by surgery, P. Pittaluga
        by endovenous ablation, J. Labastie
  11.40     MCQ and discussion: have you changed your mind after these presentations and debates in  terms of your procedures?
         
  12.00     Visit of the exhibition hall
  13.00     Lunch in the exhibition hall
         
 
Moderators
    SESSION IV: MISCELLANOUS
M. Lugli
  14.00     QoL evaluation and chronic venous disease: how to carry this out during our daily practice?
A. Mansilha
  14.10     Impact of the environment/the welcome, etc., on the well being of the patients (day surgery) and their satisfaction rate, I. Vanhandenhove
  14.20     Randomized controlled trials in varicose veins endovenous treatment. A critical review,
M. Perrin
  14.30     Discussion
         
 
Moderators
    SESSION V: THERMAL TECHNIQUES
L. Kabnick, M. S. Whiteley
         
  14.40     Which one do you prefer: laser, radiofrequency, steam or super glue ablation?
MCQ from clinical cases: what is your opinion at this stage?
  14.50     5 year follow up: between the different therapeutic options, what is the best? L. Rasmussen
  15.00     Optimising outcomes after endovenous interventions – is technique more important than choice of catheter? M. Gohel
  15.10     Endovenous laser Update: New Wavelength or New Fiber? L. Kabnick
  15.20     Endovenous laser ablation: results and evolution of the procedure from the beginning,
G. Spreafico
  15.30     Now that we have 5 year data on Closure Fast and Closure: is there a difference? T. Proebstle
  15.40     Cyanoacrylate-superglue for GSV ablation: is it ready for unrestricted use? T. Proebstle
  15.50     Radial endovenous laser vs RF ablation: advantages-disadvantages, M. S. Whiteley
  16.00     Celon Radiofrequency: results and evolution of the procedure from the beginning,
C. Hamel Desnos
  16.10     Indications for preferring endovenous laser treatment to traditional surgery: ten years’ experience of a single center, C. Spartera
  16.20     Treatment of the great saphenous vein GSV and their tributaries by steam: first results, Y. Alimi
  16.30     MCQ and discussion: have you changed your mind after these presentations and debates in terms of your procedures?
  16.40     Discussion and conclusion, J-L.Gérard, P. Gloviczki, M. Perrin
         
  16.50     Adjournment